ARTICLES OF AN ADVOCATE: "1. When the ingredients of Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1983 were not satisfied by the 2nd and 3rd defendants, whether the lower appellate court was justified in holding that they were bona fide purchasers for value without notice? 2. When the original title deeds of the property in question was not with the vendor (1st defendant) but with the plaintiff and the plaintiff was cultivating the crops on the land in question and the 2nd and 3rd defendants purchased hurriedly even after knowing that there was sale agreement and the 2nd sale deed in favour of the 3rd defendant was after the plaintiff had sent a lawyers notice, whether it could be said that the ingredients of Section 19(b) had been satisfied namely bona fide purchasers for value without notice had been satisfied? 3. When the various tests laid down by the court in the following decisions, AIR 1968 Madras 383, AIR 1991 Madras p.209 were not satisfied whether the lower appellate court could still state that the ingredients of Section 19(b) had been satisfied by the defendants?"